Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Renault Trafic 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 35 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 70 NM more than Renault Trafic. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Trafic is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1280 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 1180 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Vivaro, Nissan Primastar | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Trafic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.18 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.96 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 8 cm shorter than the Renault Trafic, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`825 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |