Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Renault Trafic 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 8.7 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 4 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Renault Trafic. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 8.6 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Trafic is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1180 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 1040 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.96 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 32 cm longer than the Renault Trafic, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 21 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |