Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Renault Grand Espace 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Espace is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 26 HP less power than Renault Grand Espace, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.6 | |
|
The Renault Grand Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Espace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 14 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 10 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Qashqai, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Opel Vivaro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Espace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Renault Grand Espace 2006 2.0 engine: The engine has a good power to fuel consumption ratio and, with careful maintenance, a long service life. The most common problems with these engines are with the fuel injection system and lubrication. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 24 cm longer than the Renault Grand Espace, 14 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 456 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 3050 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1080 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.6 metres more than that of the Renault Grand Espace, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Renault Grand Espace has
| |