Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Renault Espace 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Renault Espace is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 1 HP less power than Renault Espace, but torque is 40 NM more than Renault Espace. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1070 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 1010 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Grand Espace, Renault VEL Satis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Espace might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 44 cm longer than the Renault Espace, 14 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 291 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 291 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 2860 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 metres more than that of the Renault Espace, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`555 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Renault Espace has
| |