Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Mitsubishi Grandis 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 13 HP more power than Mitsubishi Grandis, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Mitsubishi Grandis. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Grandis is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Grandis, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 285 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Grandis. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 730 km with real consumption | 890 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Grandis gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.76 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 34 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Grandis, 20 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 320 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 320 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 1545 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2585 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Grandis, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`340 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Mitsubishi Grandis has
| |