Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Mazda MPV 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 13 HP more power than Mazda MPV, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Mazda MPV. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda MPV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MPV, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MPV. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda MPV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 370'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Grand Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Used also on Mazda 6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chrysler Grand Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 30 cm longer than the Mazda MPV, 17 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 294 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 294 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 2745 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1385 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda MPV, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`395 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Mazda MPV has
| |