Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Kia Carnival 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 16.4 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 5 HP more power than Kia Carnival, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Kia Carnival. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Carnival is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 730 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 18 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Used also on Hyundai Terracan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 18 cm longer than the Kia Carnival, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 302 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 618 litres more trunk space than the Kia Carnival. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 metres less than that of the Kia Carnival, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |