Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Kia Carnival 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 324 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 19 HP more power than Kia Carnival, whereas torque is 36 NM more than Kia Carnival. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 18 cm longer than the Kia Carnival, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 302 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 618 litres more trunk space than the Kia Carnival. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 metres less than that of the Kia Carnival, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`550 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |