Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Hyundai H1 2007
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 343 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 33 HP more power than Hyundai H1, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Hyundai H1. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.3 | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Grand Voyager) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.13 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.93 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 3 cm shorter than the Hyundai H1, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 18 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 851 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler Grand Voyager has 69 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai H1. The Hyundai H1 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.8 metres more than that of the Hyundai H1, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 3`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Hyundai H1 has
| |