Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Fiat Scudo 2006
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 149 HP | 90 HP | |
Torque: | 360 NM | 180 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 17.1 seconds | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 59 HP more power than Fiat Scudo, whereas torque is 180 NM more than Fiat Scudo. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 7.2 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.2 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
The Fiat Scudo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Scudo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Scudo. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
1110 km on highway | 1210 km on highway | ||
730 km with real consumption | 1090 km with real consumption | ||
Fiat Scudo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.10 m | 4.81 m | |
Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
Height: | 1.75 m | 1.94 m | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 30 cm longer than the Fiat Scudo, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 19 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1600 | 4200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Fiat Scudo has
| |