Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Chrysler Town & Country 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.8 Diesel | 3.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 149 HP | 174 HP | |
| Torque: | 360 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 25 HP less power than Chrysler Town & Country, but torque is 82 NM more than Chrysler Town & Country. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 10.8 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Town & Country, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 880 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 1110 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Grand Voyager and Chrysler Town & Country are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 153 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 153 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 4754 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Town & Country (by 624 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Town & Country has
| |