Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2005

 
Chrysler Grand Voyager
2004 - 2007
Volkswagen Sharan
2005 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 140 HP140 HP
Torque: 312 NM310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.9 seconds12.8 seconds
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive.
Chrysler Grand Voyager and Volkswagen Sharan have the same engine power, but Chrysler Grand Voyager torque is 2 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.86.2
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 240 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 5.10 m4.63 m
Width: 2.00 m1.81 m
Height: 1.75 m1.73 m
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger.
Chrysler Grand Voyager is 47 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 19 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 920 litres256 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
4130 litresno data
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity.
Chrysler Grand Voyager has 664 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Turning diameter: 12 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`6002`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 20002600
Rating in user reviews: 8.1/10 6.1/10
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Grand Voyager has
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv