Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Chrysler Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager and Chrysler Voyager have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.7 | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 960 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 29 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`600 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 8.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
| |