Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.8 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 engine produces 16 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008, whereas torque is 142 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 9.3 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 could require 405 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Jeep Wrangler, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 5.14 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.95 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 is 4 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 638 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 3296 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 has 282 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008. The Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 (by 834 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2008. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`775 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |