Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Renault Grand Espace 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Espace is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 23 HP less power than Renault Grand Espace, whereas torque is 52 NM less than Renault Grand Espace. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 10.5 | |
|
The Renault Grand Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Espace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 2.4 engine Renault Grand Espace 2006 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Grand Espace 2006 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 24 cm longer than the Renault Grand Espace, 14 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 456 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 3050 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1080 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.6 metres more than that of the Renault Grand Espace, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`555 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Renault Grand Espace has
| |