Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Kia Carnival 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 15.5 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 3 HP less power than Kia Carnival, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Kia Carnival. Despite less power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 12.4 | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Rover 75, Rover 400 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 18 cm longer than the Kia Carnival, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 302 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 618 litres more trunk space than the Kia Carnival. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 metres less than that of the Kia Carnival, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`555 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |