Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 vs Kia Carnival 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 218 NM | 224 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 3 HP less power than Kia Carnival, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Kia Carnival. Despite less power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 10.9 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Land Rover Freelander, Rover 75, Rover 400 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.10 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 18 cm longer than the Kia Carnival, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 302 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 3320 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 618 litres more trunk space than the Kia Carnival. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 810 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 metres less than that of the Kia Carnival, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`505 | 2`555 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |