Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Renault Espace 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 330 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Renault Espace is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 65 HP less power than Renault Espace, whereas torque is 45 NM less than Renault Espace. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 6.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.7 | 12.2 | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Renault Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Grand Espace, Renault VEL Satis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chrysler Grand Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 43 cm longer than the Renault Espace, 14 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 291 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 291 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 2860 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 metres more than that of the Renault Espace, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`545 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Renault Espace has
| |