Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Chrysler Pacifica 2003
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 253 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 339 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Pacifica is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 73 HP less power than Chrysler Pacifica, whereas torque is 54 NM less than Chrysler Pacifica. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 4.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.7 | 12.3 | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Pacifica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 87 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Pacifica gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Grand Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.05 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.01 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.69 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 4 cm longer than the Chrysler Pacifica, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 369 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 369 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 2250 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1880 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2.1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Pacifica, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Pacifica has
| |