Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Seat Alhambra 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 180 HP | 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 285 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Seat Alhambra is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 24 HP less power than Seat Alhambra, but torque is 20 NM more than Seat Alhambra. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.7 | 11.9 | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 590 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 750 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 46 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, 19 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |