Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Chrysler Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager and Chrysler Voyager have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.7 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 28 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
| |