Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 312 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 and Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.8 | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 is 1 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 4130 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
| |