Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Toyota Previa 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 24 HP more power than Toyota Previa, whereas torque is 62 NM more than Toyota Previa. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Previa is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Previa. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Previa gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Toyota Previa 2003 2.0 engine: The engine was known for its solid technical characteristics.
One of its drawbacks is the lack of hydraulic lifters, requiring periodic valve clearance adjustments. The next-generation 1AD-FTV engine was equipped with ... More about Toyota Previa 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 31 cm longer than the Toyota Previa, 21 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 495 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 2370 litres | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 425 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Previa. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1760 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Previa, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Toyota Previa has
| |