Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Toyota Hiace 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 31 HP more power than Toyota Hiace, whereas torque is 52 NM more than Toyota Hiace. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Grand Voyager) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Toyota Hiace) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.98 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 40 cm longer than the Toyota Hiace, 31 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 23 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 5600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
| |