Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Seat Alhambra 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager and Seat Alhambra have the same engine power, but Chrysler Grand Voyager torque is 2 NM more than Seat Alhambra. Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1040 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 46 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, 19 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 256 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
4130 litres | 2610 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1520 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`630 kg | 2`510 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`995 kg | 1`665 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 635 kg | 845 kg | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 33 procentiem less than Seat Alhambra. Therefore, Seat Alhambra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |