Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Mazda MPV 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 4 HP more power than Mazda MPV, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Mazda MPV. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda MPV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MPV, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda MPV. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 1050 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda MPV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 29 cm longer than the Mazda MPV, 17 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 294 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 294 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 2745 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1385 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda MPV, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`395 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Mazda MPV has
| |