Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Mazda 5 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 12.9 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 30 HP more power than Mazda 5, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Mazda 5. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 210 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 950 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 59 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 24 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 1566 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2564 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`225 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |