Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Kia Carnival 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 144 HP | |
| Torque: | 312 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 4 HP less power than Kia Carnival, but torque is 2 NM more than Kia Carnival. Despite less power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 8.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Carnival is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Carnival. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1130 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 17 cm longer than the Kia Carnival, 10 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 302 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 618 litres more trunk space than the Kia Carnival. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 13 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 metres less than that of the Kia Carnival, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`665 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Kia Carnival has
| |