Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Renault Espace 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.1 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Espace is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 18 HP less power than Renault Espace, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Renault Espace. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | 10.5 | |
|
The Renault Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 83 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 790 km in combined cycle | |
| 760 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| Renault Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Renault Grand Espace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 2.4 engine Renault Espace 2003 2.0 engine: This engine offers a respectable lifespan for a turbocharged motor but comes with several recurring issues that demand attention. One common problem is oil consumption, which can result from hardened valve seals or, in later ... More about Renault Espace 2003 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 43 cm longer than the Renault Espace, 14 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 291 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 291 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 2860 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1270 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 metres more than that of the Renault Espace, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 7.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Renault Espace has
| |