Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 218 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 and Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004 have the same engine power, but Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 torque is 8 NM more than Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 10.1 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 15 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 5.10 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 is 1 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2004, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 4130 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`505 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
| |