Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Seat Alhambra 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 32 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 56 NM more than Seat Alhambra. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.4 | |
|
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 46 cm longer than the Seat Alhambra, 19 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 256 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 664 litres more trunk space than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |