Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 vs Mazda 5 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.4 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 147 HP | 145 HP | |
| Torque: | 226 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 2 HP more power than Mazda 5, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Mazda 5. Despite the higher power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 8.2 | |
|
The Mazda 5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | Used also on Mazda 6 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chrysler Grand Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 2.4 engine: This engine features a thin-walled cast-iron cylinder block, an aluminum cylinder head with dual overhead camshafts, a timing belt system, two balance shafts, hydraulic lifters, a dual-mass flywheel, and a dampened crankshaft pulley. It has received numerous ... More about Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.09 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 2.00 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.75 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 53 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 24 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 920 litres | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 112 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 920 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4130 litres | 1566 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2564 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1.4 metres more than that of the Mazda 5, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`630 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Mazda 5 has
| |