Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 vs Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 3.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 307 NM | 332 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 engine produces 52 HP less power than Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.6 | 13.0 | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 570 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 is smaller. Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler Grand Voyager 2001, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 920 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 4130 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
| |