Chrysler Grand Voyager 1997 vs Chevrolet Blazer 1998
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.8 Petrol | 4.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 166 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 307 NM | 338 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.6 seconds | 10.1 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Blazer is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 24 HP less power than Chevrolet Blazer, whereas torque is 31 NM less than Chevrolet Blazer. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.6 | 14.3 | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Blazer, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 470 km in combined cycle | |
| 690 km on highway | 600 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chrysler Grand Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 43 cm longer than the Chevrolet Blazer, 18 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 1903 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1920 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`041 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chevrolet Blazer has
| |