Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Mercedes Vito 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 143 HP | |
| Torque: | 275 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 14.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 13 HP more power than Mercedes Vito, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Mercedes Vito. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.3 | 11.6 | |
|
The Mercedes Vito is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes Vito, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes Vito gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 630'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mercedes Vito engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Concorde | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.66 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 41 cm longer than the Mercedes Vito, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mercedes Vito, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Mercedes Vito has
| |