Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2006
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 201 HP | |
| Torque: | 275 NM | 307 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 45 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.3 | 13.2 | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Jeep Grand Cherokee gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Grand Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Concorde | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Jeep Cherokee, Dodge RAM, Dodge Durango, Dodge Nitro | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 32 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | 1909 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler Grand Voyager has 307 litres less trunk space than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. This could mean that the Chrysler Grand Voyager uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 2971 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |