Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Ford Galaxy 1995

 
Chrysler Grand Voyager
1996 - 2001
Ford Galaxy
1995 - 2000
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 3.3 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 156 HP115 HP
Torque: 275 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 seconds13.1 seconds
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive.
Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 41 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 13.310.0
Real fuel consumption: 12.8 l/100km9.8 l/100km
The Ford Galaxy is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 3.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 495 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 560 km in combined cycle750 km in combined cycle
700 km on highway960 km on highway
580 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption
Ford Galaxy gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 5.07 m4.62 m
Width: 1.92 m1.80 m
Height: 1.74 m1.73 m
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger.
Chrysler Grand Voyager is 45 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 12 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 671 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
4880 litresno data
Turning diameter: 12 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.9 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`5001`800
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 1000800
Rating in user reviews: 7.0/10 8.3/10
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Grand Voyager has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
Ford Galaxy has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv