Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Chrysler Voyager 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 147 HP | |
| Torque: | 275 NM | 226 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 9 HP more power than Chrysler Voyager, whereas torque is 49 NM more than Chrysler Voyager. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.3 | 12.0 | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 760 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Concorde | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Jeep Cherokee, Dodge Grand Caravan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 27 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 6.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |