Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Chrysler Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 275 NM | 275 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11.7 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager and Chrysler Voyager have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.3 | 12.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.8 l/100km | 11.6 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 580 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
| Chrysler Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 34 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | 450 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager has more luggage capacity. Chrysler Grand Voyager has 221 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |