Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Volkswagen Caravelle 1990
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 275 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 46 HP more power than Volkswagen Caravelle, whereas torque is 85 NM more than Volkswagen Caravelle. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.3 | 10.9 | |
|
The Volkswagen Caravelle is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caravelle, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 360 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 890 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Caravelle gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Grand Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 3 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Concorde | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.79 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.94 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 28 cm longer than the Volkswagen Caravelle, 8 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
4880 litres | 5400 litres | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager has 131 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Caravelle. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caravelle (by 520 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Caravelle. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`500 kg | 2`590 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`875 kg | 1`700 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 625 kg | 890 kg | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 42 procentiem less than Volkswagen Caravelle. Therefore, Volkswagen Caravelle is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 3000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 8.9/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Volkswagen Caravelle has
| |