Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Opel Sintra 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 2.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 275 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 15 HP more power than Opel Sintra, whereas torque is 73 NM more than Opel Sintra. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.3 | 9.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.8 l/100km | 10.3 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Sintra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Sintra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 570 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Sintra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Opel Sintra gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Grand Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 4 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Concorde | Used also on Opel Frontera | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but slightly lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 40 cm longer than the Opel Sintra, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | 460 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 671 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | 3765 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 1115 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.6 metres more than that of the Opel Sintra, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`345 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Opel Sintra has
| |