Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Dodge Caravan 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.3 Petrol | 3.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 156 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 275 NM | 285 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 24 HP less power than Dodge Caravan, whereas torque is 10 NM less than Dodge Caravan. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.3 | 11.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 12.8 l/100km | 12.2 l/100km | |
|
The Dodge Caravan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Caravan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Caravan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km on highway | 770 km on highway | ||
| 580 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
| Dodge Caravan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 560'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chrysler Grand Voyager engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Voyager, Dodge Grand Caravan, Chrysler Concorde | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Chrysler Grand Voyager, Chrysler Voyager, Chrysler Town & Country | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 2.00 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.75 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 27 cm longer than the Dodge Caravan, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | 566 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 566 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 671 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | 4160 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler Grand Voyager (by 720 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Dodge Caravan has
| |