Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 13.7 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 1 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 6.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 360 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 44 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 6.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |