Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999 vs Jeep Grand Cherokee 2005
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 218 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 104 HP less power than Jeep Grand Cherokee, whereas torque is 248 NM less than Jeep Grand Cherokee. Due to the lower power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 4.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 10.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 11.5 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jeep Grand Cherokee. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 78 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Jeep Grand Cherokee engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Jeep Commander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 32 cm longer than the Jeep Grand Cherokee, 5 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 978 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1909 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.8 metres more than that of the Jeep Grand Cherokee, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`750 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Jeep Grand Cherokee has
| |