Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999 vs Chrysler Voyager 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 114 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager and Chrysler Voyager have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 9.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 9.0 l/100km | |
|
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Voyager. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 810 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager is 34 cm longer than the Chrysler Voyager, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler Voyager, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Chrysler Voyager has
| |