Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999 vs Toyota Picnic 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 13.9 seconds | |
| Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 24 HP more power than Toyota Picnic, whereas torque is 57 NM more than Toyota Picnic. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Picnic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 930 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 54 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 22 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |