Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999 vs Renault Trafic 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 82 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 32 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 72 NM more than Renault Trafic. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 8.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Trafic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 105 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 1080 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Trafic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Renault Trafic engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Trafic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Chrysler Grand Voyager engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Trafic 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Renault Trafic 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.94 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger, but lower. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 29 cm longer than the Renault Trafic, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`765 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |