Chrysler Grand Voyager 1999 vs Opel Zafira 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 101 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 14 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 13 HP more power than Opel Zafira, whereas torque is 32 NM more than Opel Zafira. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.4 l/100km | 6.8 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Zafira is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Zafira, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Zafira. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Opel Zafira engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Signum | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Chrysler Grand Voyager might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 75 cm longer than the Opel Zafira, 18 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 145 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 145 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1700 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1.5 metres more than that of the Opel Zafira, which means Chrysler Grand Voyager can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`500 kg | 2`020 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 7.7/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Opel Zafira has
| |