Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1997
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 114 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 262 NM | 202 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 19.3 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 24 HP more power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Volkswagen Sharan. Thanks to more power Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 5.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 6.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler Grand Voyager could require 315 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 75 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1130 km in combined cycle | |
| 1040 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| 880 km with real consumption | 1080 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 600'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Sharan engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Chrysler Voyager, Jeep Cherokee | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Audi A4, Volkswagen Polo, Seat Toledo, Seat Cordoba | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.92 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
|
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 45 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 7.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |