Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 114 HP | 115 HP | |
Torque: | 262 NM | 310 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.8 seconds | 14.7 seconds | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 1 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Despite less power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 11.2 | |
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 75 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
1040 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.07 m | 4.63 m | |
Width: | 1.92 m | 1.81 m | |
Height: | 1.74 m | 1.73 m | |
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger. Chrysler Grand Voyager is 44 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 671 litres | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
4880 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 2200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 6.1/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler Grand Voyager has
|
Volkswagen Sharan has
| |