Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000

 
Chrysler Grand Voyager
1996 - 1998
Volkswagen Sharan
2000 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 114 HP115 HP
Torque: 262 NM310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.8 seconds14.7 seconds
Chrysler Grand Voyager engine produces 1 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 48 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Despite less power, Chrysler Grand Voyager reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.711.2
The Chrysler Grand Voyager is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Chrysler Grand Voyager consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Chrysler Grand Voyager over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 860 km in combined cycle620 km in combined cycle
1040 km on highway780 km on highway
Chrysler Grand Voyager gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)

Dimensions

Length: 5.07 m4.63 m
Width: 1.92 m1.81 m
Height: 1.74 m1.73 m
Chrysler Grand Voyager is larger.
Chrysler Grand Voyager is 44 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 11 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler Grand Voyager is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 671 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
4880 litresno data
Turning diameter: 12 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Chrysler Grand Voyager is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan.
Gross weight (kg): 2`5002`000
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 10002600
Rating in user reviews: 7.0/10 6.1/10
Pros and Cons: Chrysler Grand Voyager has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • has 4x4 drive
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv